CommentStreams:D1c1d37d33971dca888ec2852d59c0af

I need to ask both how you and op calculated the damage to get 64 based on the formula on the page. Using an excel spreadsheet the final damage for op's rapier comes out to 63.189 (including the -10% PDR from the dummy which was causing the initial issues of the comment). However, part of the page here states that the damage numbers displayed by the dummy are rounded down. If both the damage and display are true then at most the damage of the rapier would have to be 64 <= x <= 65. At the same time, using the exact numbers, there is a difference of 0.811 between the above math and using the equation, which appears because of the rounding done on the 57.99 (0.01 * 1.1 = 0.011) and the math (58*1.1=63.8). Working backwards with these numbers would mean the starting damage of the rapier is ~29.482. I do not want to state op is lying about the damage appearing but no matter which way I calculate the damage I cannot get the final number to be 64 from a base of 29 with the other variables, and I am just wanting to double check if my excel sheet is wrong.